Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/social
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Stephan pfp
Stephan
@stephancill
In web2 you delegate control of your data to a single company, but at least you typically have privacy controls as a user In current decentralized social paradigms you completely surrender control of your data - it’s free for all This is actually an ownership *downgrade* if you ask me
7 replies
2 recasts
20 reactions

Justin Hunter pfp
Justin Hunter
@polluterofminds
Had a similar thought a while back. https://farcaster.xyz/polluterofminds/0x3c74a65a
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

mark mollé pfp
mark mollé
@marmo.eth
thank you i’m usually shadow banned for less than endeavoring to explain to the onchain gang that open data is in some respects is actually worse for privacy that closed data controlled by one contractually bound to protect your data
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

ken pfp
ken
@tipsysquid
for me it is an upgrade in the sense that it disrupts the old untrustworthy guard. web3 has much to grow to match the ux and feature set
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Joy pfp
Joy
@cryptobaddie
True
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

FinanceQ8 pfp
FinanceQ8
@financeq8
I agree We are enjoying openness currently with blockchain We need privacy solutions as soon as possible
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dave Shake pfp
Dave Shake
@daveshake
Privacy first blockchains and zk proofs ftw
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

SQX pfp
SQX
@sqx
Finance will never fully uptick on chain. It’s a downgrade.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction