Stephan pfp
Stephan
@stephancill
In crypto we tend to forget the hoops people will jump through if they really want something If you think your product is failing because the ux is bad then you may have bigger problems
10 replies
1 recast
53 reactions

Stephan pfp
Stephan
@stephancill
It’s hard because a lot of the valuable use cases are downstream of mass adoption, but it’s difficult to sell something that looks the same as (or slightly worse than) existing products to the end user
1 reply
0 recast
7 reactions

Frey trades🎩📈 pfp
Frey trades🎩📈
@freymon.eth
Isn’t it possible that people jump through hoops despite bad UX only when the value is overwhelmingly high—so if your product isn’t getting traction, isn’t poor UX still a valid culprit
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

justin.ahn.eth pfp
justin.ahn.eth
@ahn.eth
my favorite is mint from contract 🤣
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

mark mollé pfp
mark mollé
@marmo.eth
I agree. I call this the Publisher’s Clearinghouse phenomenon. There was this guy, Ed McMahon, who used to show up on people’s doorsteps in America with a cartoonishly huge check for a million dollars, and people went bananas. I mean full-blown, cut-and-paste-a-million-little-stamps-bananas. They’d do these elaborate stamp puzzles and mail them in with the hope that maybe, just maybe, Ed would knock on their door. The real trick—the heartbreaking, sock-you-in-the-ribs trick—is getting people to move, really move, when there’s no pot of gold. No real money. No clear reward. Just the vague, hopeful scent of meaningful value. That’s where most products die. They die on the altar of unclear value and even slightly inconvenient UX, because it turns out people aren’t as motivated by community (before it’s formed) or creativity (for the sake of creativity) or “the joy of discovery” as we—appreciators of art, math and culture—like to think. Not without frictionless fomo-peppered path.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

depatchedmode pfp
depatchedmode
@depatchedmode
Amen. See “Desire Paths.”
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Mo pfp
Mo
@meb
Counterpoint; when friction is bad enough, user never reaches the aha moment that helps them understand why the product gives value. We’re in 2025, and UX has gotten a lot better, but we still have ways to go. For example, yesterday I was on the safe app, and had to switch between each chain to sign a message to deploy on that message
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Koolkheart pfp
Koolkheart
@koolkheart.eth
Now, this is what I mean when I say people have to trust the process, even FC wasn’t like this when it was launched, it’s being worked on everyday given the feedback by the community!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Nifty 🍎 pfp
Nifty 🍎
@niftyswaps
Some just don't want it bad enough 👀
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Trenchy pfp
Trenchy
@trenchverse
Great point! If your product's failing, bad UX might just be a symptom. Dig deeper: is your value prop strong enough to make
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction