Stephan pfp
Stephan
@stephancill
Maybe it’s just the case that we want farcaster to be something it’s not
7 replies
7 recasts
48 reactions

tldr (tim reilly) pfp
tldr (tim reilly)
@tldr
Distilling our past convos on this, something I’d add: I sincerely believe Farcaster *wants* to be as decentralized as they can be… while still also becoming relevant and being used (otherwise, it’s decentralized for nothing) If anything, MM’s mis-steps so far have been doing things that go for decentralization too soon, at the expense of growth The reason this matters is that I believe they intend to make FC the protocol we all want to it be (multi client, decentralized, permissionless) whenever the app achieves momentum on user growth.
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions

Matthew Fox 🌐 pfp
Matthew Fox 🌐
@matthewfox
Relevant https://x.com/JasonYanowitz/status/1929566771071037504?t=gIIgPgb0zEg_K1toleyJMQ&s=19
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Matt pfp
Matt
@mattlee
Caring about the protocol of an app is a nerd thing still. Only apps matter
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

jd 🌺 pfp
jd 🌺
@jdl
nah sailor. we’re so early
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Mike | Abundance 🌟 pfp
Mike | Abundance 🌟
@abundance
I'm of that view that it's whatever we want it to be (.. until it's not)
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

ash pfp
ash
@ashmoney.eth
bingo
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Frey trades🎩📈 pfp
Frey trades🎩📈
@freymon.eth
but it can be do you consider farcaster still in its early phases or have we passed that point yet?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction