Stephan
@stephancill
Maybe it’s just the case that we want farcaster to be something it’s not
7 replies
7 recasts
46 reactions
tldr (tim reilly)
@tldr
Distilling our past convos on this, something I’d add: I sincerely believe Farcaster *wants* to be as decentralized as they can be… while still also becoming relevant and being used (otherwise, it’s decentralized for nothing) If anything, MM’s mis-steps so far have been doing things that go for decentralization too soon, at the expense of growth The reason this matters is that I believe they intend to make FC the protocol we all want to it be (multi client, decentralized, permissionless) whenever the app achieves momentum on user growth.
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
Stephan
@stephancill
Agree on all. By decentralising this early they made their already impossible job twice has hard I wouldn’t bet that they would have done it again if they knew they’d end up on mini apps as the developer growth vector https://farcaster.xyz/stephancill/0x8e3ef694
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions