lens

Can someone explain to me why a social protocol needs an evm and zk proofs for every state change pls

Can someone explain to me why a social protocol needs an evm and zk proofs for every state change pls

https://x.com/LensProtocol/status/1790458242855751950

from what i understand lens data which is on-chain (posts, user data, social graph, and reactions) is going to move to an evm-based validium blockchain which needs to post state proofs to an L1

am i misunderstanding something?

https://app.t2.world/article/clw6l2z0018727620mc1dq26xr2 - this is the blogpost i read

Growth @avara. Formerly co-founder at @jpg @ethberlin / 
sometimes contributor @forbescrypto

A little bit only! 
It’s about design choices: Lens Network believes on everything onchain. If we come up with an architecture that makes onchain-ness light and easy for builders and users, why is it overengineered?
Lens will be hybrid as well - in order for lighter proofs for social data.

Reading the blogpost would help. 
Not every state change needs “an evm and zkproofs”

Working on @farcoin https://github.com/farcoin-xyz

Yea, well, in that case it does feels overengineered (per your other cast). This channel is funny. Sub 400 ppl.  Lens is hot on fc!  / s

It’s not, just using zk because that’s the more recognisable term for validity proofs

Without looking into it at all, if zk = privacy of some user data, that feels like a positive outcome.

In the long run it might sense though but very faint hope on that if we think finance is core to Web3 Social.

So that you can hide the spammy nfts you get on every follow by just muting an entire network in your wallet.

Devs do something. Token isn’t pumping.