lens

Can someone explain to me why a social protocol needs an evm and zk proofs for every state change pls

Can someone explain to me why a social protocol needs an evm and zk proofs for every state change pls

https://x.com/LensProtocol/status/1790458242855751950

Reading the blogpost would help. 
Not every state change needs “an evm and zkproofs”

from what i understand lens data which is on-chain (posts, user data, social graph, and reactions) is going to move to an evm-based validium blockchain which needs to post state proofs to an L1

am i misunderstanding something?

https://app.t2.world/article/clw6l2z0018727620mc1dq26xr2 - this is the blogpost i read

Growth @avara. Formerly co-founder at @jpg @ethberlin / 
sometimes contributor @forbescrypto

Validium is a lean scaling solution as well. I dont see posting proofs as overengineering, but curious to know why you think this.

https://ethereum.org/en/developers/docs/scaling/validium/

A little bit only! 
It’s about design choices: Lens Network believes on everything onchain. If we come up with an architecture that makes onchain-ness light and easy for builders and users, why is it overengineered?
Lens will be hybrid as well - in order for lighter proofs for social data.