While it's great that the auto-follow list is no more, the damage has already been done in that any (off-the-shelf) influence-driven algorithm will heavily skew to favor accounts that were on that list.. unless proper adjustments have been made

And if you're developing your own proprietary influence-driven algorithm, it's imperative to take this into account cc: @betashop.eth

Some food for thought for the @openrank & @airstack.eth teams..

Specific to OpenRank's Following Rank + Airstack's Far Score: excluding accounts that have never casted (there are 200K+!) from your respective algorithms (when looking to the followers of an account) will help alleviate the skew which heavily favors accounts that were on the auto-follow list

The official account for Airstack, developer of @moxie-protocol. airstack.xyz. On a mission to grow the Farcaster GDP.

Some food for thought for the @openrank & @airstack.eth teams..

Specific to OpenRank's Following Rank + Airstack's Far Score: excluding accounts that have never casted (there are 200K+!) from your respective algorithms (when looking to the followers of an account) will help alleviate the skew which heavily favors accounts that were on the auto-follow list https://warpcast.com/geoffgolberg/0x82ad8678

I like running, poker and oysters | Founder, Social Forensics (SocialForensics.com) | Berkeley & UPenn | Learning to listen

we'll study it, it's an interesting suggestion

some questions i have: do you feel like some casts are earning too much? or that some casts don't earn enough? flattening the curve at the top will just mean less rewards for gaining influential distribution. are you also recommending we add more weightage in the middle? if so, what would be the rationale as to why?

🥷 at Senpi:  senpi.ai 
 | Your AI edge in the market — finding signal, auto-trading, mastering exits. Welcome to the onchain dojo.

What about minimum 500 follower to start earning moxie? Well bot usually -500 follower