noice

the last 3 weeks blew past our expectations.
1.1M tips sent by ~4.6K people. 27K earned with noice.

none of this happens without our community

we're kicking off noice summer to return the love - starting with noice raindrops v1

starting monday, every tip from a noice OG gets a 3x $noice match by us - they tip you $1, you get $4

OGs are 50+ early adopters - builders, creators, athletes, designers - engaging with a wide range of content across farcaster

each has $200 to tip - post well and they’ll find you

raindrops are just the start

the 20B $noice community pool was set up to reward the people shaping the noice economy:

>genuine creators
>thoughtful curators tipping great content
>diamond hands backing us with $noice

the first $noice airdrop goes live july 4, distributing 10% of the community pool (2B $noice)

four more airdrops will follow - rolling out monthly through november

to avoid inauthentic behaviour and to reward the right, incentive aligned community members, we're partnering 
@openrank, socialforensics.com, and quotient.social for the upcoming $noice airdrops

Quick question - has data on quotient been updated lately @ruminations ? Quick testing looks like it might be a little stale

Applied AI, databases, data, vibe coding (sic.), open source, community/devrel, remote. 

itinerant businessperson. globalist.

Kuala Lumpur, Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

No haven’t updated in three weeks. 

I was out for two with a flu. 

Working on upgrading our data infrastructure to refresh scores daily.

Glad you are feeling better. I’m a bit lost on how your metrics work. Yet I hope my crap rating won’t screw things up to bad.

stream of concious writer, musician, & artist | co-founder of /wac

Your rating is pretty good, #331 is in the top .0003% of users. 

Can you say more about what confuses you about the metrics?

I guess when I looked at the ranking that a larger number meant lower down like a lot of things here do.

gotcha makes sense, there isn't really anything to contextualize the ranking/score, comparatively. i'll add something

Accounts at the very top of any influence ranking leaderboard are going to be the same, because influence on Farcaster is very skewed. 

However, we think our algo does a good job at identifying accounts without a lot of followers / high influence, and distinguishing between the relative influence of those accounts.

You can see this most clearly when you get above rank #250 or so.

Which tab are you looking at - all or Up and Coming? 

I don't see a lot of overlap between Up and Coming and Rewards and other metrics boards/leaderboards.

Yet I realized I was looking at the  wrong tab. So what makes this different than others? It looks like all the same accounts that dominate every other metric board?