rafa
@rafa
I think people should be able to see how many others are blocking, muting, ghosting them - and what topics they are engaging with are forcefully ignored. Knowing how many people are voluntarily there and how many people walk out are important signals to get a stronger sense of reality and approval.
4 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Les Greys
@les
Hard agree with this. The equivalent of someone talking our or showing frustration in IRL conversations. Those are the conversations worth reflecting on.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
vincent
@pixel
Interesting. Downvote is a micro version of that. "Muted count" or "blocked count" can be easily implemented if protocol natively supports mute and block (IIRC it doesn't).
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Patrick Atwater | 🌱🚴3🌐
@patwater
Great idea I also feel like it should be much easier to block / unfollow than the old ux in fb twttr etc
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Abhijit Mehta
@acm
This is a neat idea! But need to be thoughtful in how this gets presented / framed. Negative engagement *could* be a sign of disapproval (and so signaling it could nudge folks to healthier discourse) But — it also may just be a sign that people are self selecting topics that interest them, which isn’t always bad.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction