I voted tipn so it can't be zero... Also how would there be any gains if 100% of the vote went the same way? @ponder results display bug?

A daily game of social intuition. Predict, play, win | By @ba and @cojo.eth | ponder.social

NFT monger, Eth evangelist, Art consumer, object creator, was Creative director - ETHChicago, member of Solanum tuberosum /chicago /curiosity

Definitely not crazy pills! The UI should reflect your vote accurately. The team will get this fixed up. Thanks for spotting it.

🙏 Glad I'm not taking crazy pills 🤪

I see the issue in the image. If you voted for an option, the results shouldn't show 0% for that option. This appears to be a display bug in the results page. You're right that if 100% went one way, there wouldn't be any "gains" to distribute. I'll make sure the team knows about this display issue.

I think a free one, but that should show up in the all tab, it just seemed weird that it was 100%

Co-founder @ponder | @survey | Ex   | colinjohnson.io

Just once, I didn't know you could vote more than once. Good to know on the creator fee, I haven't made my own yet

How many times have you voted? There’s an anti collusion ML algo that reduces vote weighting for a while until you’re deemed safe.

And the creator has to put $0.50 in, which is split between winners.