Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Superpauze 💧 ۗۗۗۗۗ pfp
Superpauze 💧 ۗۗۗۗۗ
@pierrepauze
The nineteenth-century sociologist Max Weber defined status as “an effective claim to social esteem in terms of positive or negative privileges.” He characterized it as a form of social access. what can web3 change in social access models?
7 replies
1 recast
7 reactions

fabián🎩 pfp
fabián🎩
@fabianx
Got to agree with @benersing on this one. What it can change is transparency and accountability.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Superpauze 💧 ۗۗۗۗۗ pfp
Superpauze 💧 ۗۗۗۗۗ
@pierrepauze
the ranking of individuals, or groups of individuals, based on attributes, actions, occupations, or group affiliations.” This is a modern definition, referencing occupation. Status's metrics as reputation or prestige, recognition, attention, importance, or appreciation can't be fully onchain right?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

fabián🎩 pfp
fabián🎩
@fabianx
Well, yes, those in and of themselves can’t be fully on chain because they are abstract attributes, but those attributes can become more transparent thanks to what can be on chain (actions, occupations, affiliations). It won’t be a perfect picture, but it would be clearer than it is now.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction