Pichi pfp
Pichi
@pichi
What’s “spammy” on Farcaster is very subjective and doesn’t fit the traditional definition of “spam”. The nuance is really difficult to understand and I appreciate when the team clarifies their thinking. Maybe spamminess is as simple as interrupting other’s experience on the app. I need to chew on this for a while. https://farcaster.xyz/dwr.eth/0x83a52a8e
8 replies
8 recasts
25 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
I don’t think either of those are controversial. A reply is a conversation. Topic of conversation is the original post. Just do a top-level cast and tag the person if you have a different topic.
4 replies
0 recast
12 reactions

base pfp
base
@basewtf
we gotta let go of worrying about being spam. Live your life, who cares what the algo says
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Pichi pfp
Pichi
@pichi
Everyone I onboarded got marked as spam in the summer of ‘24. I don’t want a repeat of that in the summer of ‘25. If we want new people to thrive who find their way here, we need to guide them.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

base pfp
base
@basewtf
fund your wallet, buy pro, not be spammy and @dwr.eth will tell you to build your own client
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Pichi pfp
Pichi
@pichi
Cuts deep
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

base pfp
base
@basewtf
TBA might handle “spam” differently…
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction