Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/farcasterunion
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Pichi pfp
Pichi
@pichi
The biggest problem with the Warpcast algorithm is that is “spam” means ANY reply with ZERO engagement (no like or reply back). This is very nuanced and difficult to navigate. It is too easy to be labeled as spammy and most users will need to change their behavior when you engage with people who don’t follow you. When you follow each other, the spam rules no longer apply because you are friends. https://p1yefcr.warpcast.tools/api/frames/cold-goose-28
25 replies
18 recasts
38 reactions

Ryan J. Shaw pfp
Ryan J. Shaw
@rjs
Wait I thought you only get the label if you're replying to people who don't follow you AND don't engage with your replies AND this is happening more often than the background rate?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Pichi pfp
Pichi
@pichi
What’s the background rate?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Ryan J. Shaw pfp
Ryan J. Shaw
@rjs
I'm speculating based on how I would have done it... I would take the e.g. 99th percentile of replies data where (not a follower and no reaction/reply). This would give you a number e.g. 99% of people get at least a 20% engagement rate on their non-follower replies, and if the user is getting a worse rate than that then they're acting against social norms here and are probably spamming so they get a warning. You can get more fancy and do this calc for each type of engagement and/or the combination, but the idea is that it's an objective measure of what's "normal".
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction