Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

Brian Flynn pfp
Brian Flynn
@flynn.eth
one reason why nouns failed was because there was no truth seeking among participants. everyone was trying to extract as much as possible. farcaster feels like a much bigger wave than nouns but similar energy. hoping we can get more truth seekers on here that want to actually build new ways to coordinate.
16 replies
4 recasts
66 reactions

rubinovitz pfp
rubinovitz
@rubinovitz
What did you want or expect Nouns to accomplish?
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Brian Flynn pfp
Brian Flynn
@flynn.eth
i'm not sure to be honest. i was a holder and part of the community when i saw it was a new type of coordination that was happening over the internet. it's still one of the best experiments done so far, but only can compare it to it's own past history (which of course is subjective)
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions

rubinovitz pfp
rubinovitz
@rubinovitz
It’s hard for me to think of Nouns as having failed when it did run the experiment and many of the community members still get together and are some of my favorite in crypto. I disagree with the current biggest voting block but the voting mechanisms are working as designed.
3 replies
0 recast
8 reactions

PhiMarHal pfp
PhiMarHal
@phimarhal
I'm not even a Noun myself and I see it same as you. The cultural impact of Nouns at large seem greater than many projects with more $$$. Can argue about the % of waste, but for a radically new mechanism I'd consider it a success.
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions