Cryptomantis pfp
Cryptomantis
@cryptomantis
The $FAIR token launch on Farcaster sparked debate with a private presale where early investors held ~90% of the allocation. The creator admits it was a mistake not to enforce a 6-month lockup via smart contract initially, citing the need to raise capital. Thereโ€™s a fairer way to fund projects: @farstore, transparent token launches ensure equal access for all, avoiding insider advantages. Learn how AppCoins raised funds equitably: https://paragraph.com/@kompreni/appcoins
3 replies
2 recasts
8 reactions

flick the dev ๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿ“ฆ pfp
flick the dev ๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿ“ฆ
@flick
There are no one-sized-fits-all launch parameters, not everyone wants to launch into a high tax bonding curve. and I am happy to learn more, but I don't see how this prevents insider advantage other than transparency
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Cryptomantis pfp
Cryptomantis
@cryptomantis
There is no bonding curve; all presale buyers purchase at the floor price. If the coin doesnโ€™t launch, you receive a full refund. In the worst-case scenario after launch, you can sell with a 3% sell tax. Youโ€™re right that thereโ€™s no one-size-fits-all for launch parameters, but this feels fairer than sniped clanker launches. Check with @niftytime.eth for more details
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

niftytime pfp
niftytime
@niftytime.eth
Yep nailed it. Also you can literally see all the FC profiles and wallets participating in a farstore pre capp (ie pre cap market app) crowdfund prior to tge too
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions