pretty disinterested in accounts on here with one-way relationships to their audiences

Interests: crypto, economics, TA & blockchain related innovations | 🔗 https://linktr.ee/cryptonjal 🔗 https://dune.com/nhejyht

writing about products & protocols on Farcaster | prev. Juicebox, Nouns, RAW DAO | casting about coffee, hi-fi, and other rabbit holes

Is there already a list for the one way crew?
@cryptonjal maybe?

$hamster /hamster 
martinvr.eth 
deploy.degen.eth

In my experience, when an account fails to do two or more things (casting, replying, liking, or replying), it is a bot.

Technowatermelon. Elder Millenial. Building Farcaster. 

nf.td/varun

Kuala Lumpur, Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Building /veil -- ZK Privacy Protocol for Base

@aho @apex777.eth and @v are on my 14d naughty list 😂

1st is on livecaster casts so it wasn't really replies to aho

I think real users would eventually also just stop replying when there's never any mutual engagement

Computer said yes 😂 Isn't it like 5:40 at your place? 
Now we need for the neynar sync to get you off this list

@cryptonjal made a new one, there you can check your biggest fans that didn't get a reply yet

Bunch of mine were spam and others I did NOT get notifications for and it’s frustrating. A few were really low effort replies and I didn’t have time to figure out if they were an automated account. 

Some I liked but their reply didn’t really need a reply.

Computer said yes 😂 Isn't it like 5:40 at your place? 
Now we need for the neynar sync to get you off this list

@cryptonjal made a new one, there you can check your biggest fans that didn't get a reply yet
https://farcaster.xyz/cryptonjal/0xffb9c31f

That's the nature of Livecaster UX. It acts like an on going conversation and yet we had fun and good conversations. Sometimes data alone doesn't tell the whole story.