Content
@
https://superrare.com
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Miladbegdeli.base.eth🔵🎩✪
@miladtik2
Good morning 💎 While I have great respect for the team and the new changes, I need to point out a few concerns. The new allowance system may not benefit all users equally. Specifically, the reliance on rankings and past activity for determining allowances could seem unfair to newer or less active users. Additionally, the new system might not be fully transparent and may require more detailed explanations. I hope these issues will be addressed promptly, and that the system will be improved so that all users can benefit from it fairly and effectively. Best regards:milad begdeli
25 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Daniyelw
@daniyelw
Society is the pillar of a project. If these additions are not there, there is no project at all. Paying special attention to 5% of a project and not paying any attention to the other 95% can't be fair at all and will lead to the failure of this project.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ela
@elatav
It is true, in many cases, rich artists are not willing to interact with weak users, and among the weak users there are artists who are not seen and are not supported by rich artists, and this condition is a great injustice.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Sara A 🎩Ⓜ️
@alwayssunny112
Exactly It is too unfair
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Yaser 🎩
@kurdishman2694
I’ve been concerned ever since rumors surfaced about rank-based allowance changes. I hoped @humanzero wouldn’t repeat $DEGEN's mistake, which severely harmed both the token and the project. Unfortunately, that hope wasn’t realized, and now $RARE is at risk. My dear friend, @humanzero mentioned that ranks 500-2000 might receive allowances by relying on tips from the top 500. However, this is unrealistic since the top 95% mostly interact only with each other, making the system unfair. I strongly urge you to reconsider this update before it causes lasting damage. The community is the backbone of any project, and neglecting it will inevitably lead to failure.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
parraz
@theendofman
This isn't justice; it's the exclusion of a large number of art lovers and artists who have tried in every way to support artists and this airdrop. I hope you understand that the goal was to support the weaker segment of the art community, not the strong and wealthy one. @humanzero
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction