SuperRare

Gm!

We just shipped a new, more open and transparent version of the $RARE tipping allowance system, in collaboration with @openrank.

Here's a breakdown of how it works:

Allowances are calculated according to two main factors: 

1. Your ranking in the top 500 /superrare channel users according to OpenRank
(https://dune.com/queries/3994833)

2. Your @superrare activity over the past 6 months (weighted towards 30 day activity)

You can also receive an allowance by receiving tips from top-ranked users in the past 5 days (if your OpenRank is between 501-2,000). This gives a way for top channel users to also boost the allowance of newer members.

Huge shout out to the team, and to @openrank for helping upgrade to a more transparent system 🫡 🎉 

The FAQ has been updated with more info, and links to a support form in case you need further help:

https://help.superrare.com/en/articles/9274364-rare-tipping-faq

Good morning 💎 
While I have great respect for the team and the new changes, I need to point out a few concerns. The new allowance system may not benefit all users equally. Specifically, the reliance on rankings and past activity for determining allowances could seem unfair to newer or less active users.

Additionally, the new system might not be fully transparent and may require more detailed explanations. I hope these issues will be addressed promptly, and that the system will be improved so that all users can benefit from it fairly and effectively.

Best regards:milad begdeli

Iamilad_begdeli 31 years old👦🏻 Cryptolover from earth🌍 A web3 and crypto enthusiast :)
Digital artistry,AI style🎨

Web3 explorer | daniyelw.eth | building, curating, collecting | DM open

Attention to the entire community is very important. I hope this imbalance is addressed and all users are fairly considered.

Society is the pillar of a project. If these additions are not there, there is no project at all. Paying special attention to 5% of a project and not paying any attention to the other 95% can't be fair at all and will lead to the failure of this project.

You’re absolutely right, it’s so disheartening to see this inequality. 💔

It is true, in many cases, rich artists are not willing to interact with weak users, and among the weak users there are artists who are not seen and are not supported by rich artists, and this condition is a great injustice.

Painter, Illustrator, Vintage Lover |



https://linktr.ee/saraarjmand?utm_source=linktree_profile_share&ltsid=362c8e5e-7d84-480c-bd3a-210699e0355e

You’re so right, fairness is essential for everyone to feel valued. 💛✨

we don’t quit, we don’t cower, we don’t run. We endure and conquer.

I completely understand your concerns, and I hope they reconsider for the sake of everyone involved.

I’ve been concerned ever since rumors surfaced about rank-based allowance changes. I hoped @humanzero wouldn’t repeat $DEGEN's mistake, which severely harmed both the token and the project. Unfortunately, that hope wasn’t realized, and now $RARE is at risk.

My dear friend, @humanzero mentioned that ranks 500-2000 might receive allowances by relying on tips from the top 500. However, this is unrealistic since the top 95% mostly interact only with each other, making the system unfair.

I strongly urge you to reconsider this update before it causes lasting damage. The community is the backbone of any project, and neglecting it will inevitably lead to failure.

I am interested in the world of NFTs and enjoy learning and participating in airdrops.
parraz.base.eth

I completely agree. It's important to support those who genuinely need it, not just the already established ones. 🌸💫

This isn't justice; it's the exclusion of a large number of art lovers and artists who have tried in every way to support artists and this airdrop. I hope you understand that the goal was to support the weaker segment of the art community, not the strong and wealthy one.
@humanzero