initial thoughts after hacking with claude code (after using only cursor for 6 months)
1. I weakly prefer the output from Claude code, which is interesting because I use sonnet 4 and opus exclusively in cursor. It seems to be stronger in task management (or at least in its communication of it), which I don't notice as much from cursor agents.
2. strongly prefer cursor's visual UI vs terminal, even CC uses the terminal about as well as it could
3. not sure if cursor has an "auto accept all edits" mode but if so I haven't found it. I like that Claude code does this, but I do wish it was easier to evaluate the work it did.

Feels like OpenAI was smart to acquire windsurf, because I find myself wishing for Claude code + Cursor. Which maybe is just Cursor in a few months?

Anyway... on to try @mcbain's amp code

design @splits | /wireframe /latenightcrew /event-pass /feud

i assume so and i just haven’t found it

Bias Research Ltd. • everything will be okaos •
De-di-designer, autodidact. 🗿 • /antimeme

you can yeah—which is basically what cursor does for its own agent. but cursor has a nice UI that highlights all the changes inline in each file and lets you approve or reject them.

maybe claude code has that too and i just haven’t discovered it yet but i didn’t see it

Can you not just run Claude code in a terminal window panel within Cursor?

You’re almost there https://farcaster.xyz/joeblau/0x63672db3