Maretus pfp
Maretus
@maretus
I truly wonder the same thing. Why are we trying to move back down the value chain?
8 replies
6 recasts
83 reactions

Mike | Abundance ๐ŸŒŸ pfp
Mike | Abundance ๐ŸŒŸ
@abundance
wait, so we should be producing intellectual property (that China can steal in 5 secs) and.. "content"(?!) while all the industrial production can be done in China? That's ridiculous
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Maretus pfp
Maretus
@maretus
Digital trade is Americas strongest export and itโ€™s not even accounted for in trade deficit calculations. We export bits and bytes and import raw materials and finished products. Itโ€™s the best deal out there. Also - manufacturing capacity in the United States is literally at all time highs. We could certainly manufacture more things, but why would we want to manufacture all the things?
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Mike | Abundance ๐ŸŒŸ pfp
Mike | Abundance ๐ŸŒŸ
@abundance
it's the best deal out there until someone cuts off your supply of finished products and you have to defend yourself with bits and bytes against an industrial power. China's manufacturing capacity is about double that of the US
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Maretus pfp
Maretus
@maretus
A country with 3x the population is always going to manufacture more? We can produce important national security stuff (and we do) without starting a trade war against the entire world? Also - bits and bytes are the future of warfare. Control the flow of information, you win.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Mike | Abundance ๐ŸŒŸ pfp
Mike | Abundance ๐ŸŒŸ
@abundance
They can manufacture more, but there's no reason why we should outsource our manufacturing capacity to them. The closer liberal democracies get to parity (in total industrial capacity) with autocratic regimes the more likely we are to end up in WWIII. That's the math I see. I think it's much easier to match the "bits and bytes" part than industrial capacity, which takes years to rebuild
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction