aichannel

who is discovering the hidden elephant red flags of why nobody in AI is joining? crypto being a scam is already known. Nobody cares about the open data though. why?

i dabble with ai using open identity data from crypto https://alexpaden.tech

Why would they join? Theres no research alpha or status or $ to be gained for them here.

gm8 left because i blocked him because we were both bored doing it to each other, and because we were the only two actually promoting anything that even remotely resembles the pursuit of general intelligence.

you think he wants to read 10-20 research papers a week so someone can come and completely overshadow him in his own niche by reposting a template image of "the perfect prompt" guideline? NO. Take that shit to linkedin.

Fix the damn niches or your only AI research poster left will be @m-j-r.eth 

> this isn't directed at you @rubinovitz 

https://warpcast.com/gm8xx8/0x2f544570

Hacker founder using ai to coordinate onchain economies /tenfold, nounish channel client /comint

More: rubinovitz.com

𝖒𝖆𝖓𝖉𝖆𝖙𝖚𝖒 𝖆𝖉 𝖆𝖘𝖙𝖗𝖆

tbf I'm a lazy AI research poster

used to cast along with gm8 at /ai , but was turned off by the highlander moderator vibes.

the most direct way we can incubate upstream discussion is by involving Nous and Prime Intellect among others, upgrading crypto-compatible services like openrouter.

most importantly, SOTA is educational, and casts like mine are inadequate for the productive experience that will achieve runaway network effect. we really need instructors like Mollick, Karpathy, Carmack, Jim Fan, et al to discover the possibility of crowdfunding wrappers here that can inspire novelty back into their main gigs.

tbqh, I'm fine with watching the industry play out from my shadowy corner, will try my best to continue the async conversation.

but it honestly isn't enough.

Building Higher apparel at High Line 🧢 
Host at /clickcast /cpg || Husband to @shiwen

i think the problem is literally what you're saying "crypto X ai" companies, not "ai X crypto" companies.

the exact problem is they lean into the crypto scam shit instead of AI which mostly makes them all meaningless to anyone in AI.

Crypto NEEDS ai, ai doesn't NEED crypto (right now).

$vvv botched launch and privacy falsehoods. prime intellect trained a model that nobody uses with very low params. etc.

none actually advance AI any or provide deeper value. crypto celebrates memecoin trading bots that can be reproduced in a few hundred lines of code, or literally just token speculation.

well i want(ed) to make a business from novel ai research and despite best efforts i'm unable to do it alone / without a community of likeminded people.

re those companies: https://warpcast.com/alexpaden/0x182193f6

i agree about instructors, that's the perfect phrasing too. i'll have to put more effort towards it / that was the original reason i switched channels, to dumb the content down.

yeah, after so many years of excitement, it's a bit disappointing to see research turn into hype-forking (idk what else to call it). maybe call it momentum researching.

it occurs to me that we might discover some unlock for @abcoathup / @tim / christine kim, distilling + instilling discussions between FC & ethmagicians, for example. lowering the cost of participation with a filter may end up with more social accrual, more motivation for core devs, etc.

those companies in particular are eager to outpace the big 3, and "crypto is for the agents", but have we really seen any force multiplier besides MCP hype? meanwhile there's orbiter.host, why not agents with linktrees? why not @shl0ms alts, but more so?

to your point about doing it alone, we just have to come to terms with the fact that most of the bleeding edge is balkanized to whoever gets seed fund. I still think there's industry standards that would force emergent features, and if that's broadcasted here, it will unify & self-sustain.