lufagibb 🎭
@lufagibb
698 Following
109 Followers
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
1 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
14 recasts
35 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
1 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
9 replies
4 recasts
24 reactions
86 replies
20 recasts
115 reactions
44 replies
5 recasts
33 reactions
17 replies
31 recasts
128 reactions
44 replies
11 recasts
74 reactions
My post from 1.5 years about "assessing demand drivers for ETH" had the line "Needless to say, we’ll need to wait for EIP-4844 to assess this."
Now that EIP-4844 is out for half a year, it's indeed time to do so. As such, I'd downgrade the significance of "L2 fee burns" from 2/10 to 1/10. While it's very likely demand for blobspace is gradually going up, supply is up even more with PeerDAS imminent, plus full sharding & Nielsen's Law making blob count up only. Cross-L2 interoperability has also been much less required than anticipated, as most users are happy to stick to their chosen L2, or bridge between only occasionally
So, why was I (mildly) wrong? I did not fully understand the concept of strict global consensus then, which I only wrote about in depth later in 2023. With a better grasp of the true demand landscape for blobspace, the 1/10 is obvious
Also, this is great for Ethereum/ETH in the same way as building public roads
https://polynya.mirror.xyz/GPC26Y_rlwCyPpj_N3HeW_izY1-pIVwKW5bjuPNrGeQ 30 replies
43 recasts
142 reactions
20 replies
15 recasts
141 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
