6 replies
0 recast
27 reactions
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

appreciate your reply! i agree abundance is great, but i think my central refutation of klein's abundance is "for whom, controlled by whom, and paid for how?" without a theoried understanding of power, "build more" risks becoming a developer+landlord slogan, not a liberation/empowerment agenda.
noah’s framing - libs who hate poverty vs libs who hate wealth - misreads the actual tensions. most socialists i know don’t hate wealth itself, they hate that it's produced through exploitation and used to entrench class power.
i dislike klein's takes bc "constrictive vs expansive" makes it sound like its about vibes or aesthetics, but to me it’s about structure. rent freezes, wealth caps, labor protections get framed as "scarcity" but they’re important to shift control away from landlords/ultrawealth and capital toward working people.
the problem with the "abundance" framing is that without class consciousness, it doesn't decrease inequality. it depends on who owns what, who gets to decide, who benefits. 1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction