Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
π benna ππ©
@benna
intellectual property laws are a double edged sword. they are crucial for protecting artists and creators, but make no sense when it comes to sharing knowledge, research papers, articles etc which are often stuck behind a paywall. i do wonder if blockchain could somehow be a solution to this, but mostly itβs about changing entrenched social/legal norms.
6 replies
2 recasts
20 reactions
Konohime
@konohime.eth
It protects majors more than small artists tbh If you don't have the money to sue someone across the world, your content get used and there's nothing you can do about it Blockchain can timestamp. AI could recognise very fast. But Original Artistsβ’οΈ hate those two techs so... Β―\_ (γ) _/Β―
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
π benna ππ©
@benna
yes, very true :β-( i wonder if you abstract the tech behind it enough so that ppl wouldnβt have to know how it works, ppl would be more open?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Konohime
@konohime.eth
I don't think so, I faced the furry crowd in 2021, they're very vocal community against tech. If they discover that something was "hidden" they get even more mad ^^" But the history behind the "Right Clic Save As" from VVD is very insightful. Pure cryptoart moment π https://www.vice.com/en/article/nft-collector-sells-peoples-fursonas-for-dollar100k-in-right-click-mindset-war/
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
π benna ππ©
@benna
so, yes, if you intentionally hide it, i can understand why people would get more mad ahaha. however, i think much of this discussion comes through what is the intention behind implementing these technologies? i'd like to *hope* that with mindful use of these technologies that genuinely make a world of a difference and are not for profit, people would be more accepting. but there will ofc always be the haters who don't even bother to do the minimum research on how blockchain and AI can be beneficial for society lol and re: the VVD NFT, yes--historic crypto art moment, also totally illegal and in this case the furries were totally correct loool
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
