0xmons ✝️
@xmon.eth
i don't know how to easily verbalize this but there are many types of dicussions i do not believe i can have rn on farcaster, and i keep feeling like the content i see here is not meant for me ex 1: https://x.com/AgentChud/status/1919555187577860369 me and chud discuss merits of sway/fuel (does anyone here care abt utxos or other l2s or dsls?) ex 2: https://x.com/0xmons/status/1919489996580380871 my giving pushback on recent zora focus on not just content coins but imo general slop (see broader discussion here and some pushback on the original claim "you SHOULD support these onchain creators!") whereas the post here on fc had literally zero discussion: https://warpcast.com/dee/0x87e9fb76 lack of broader evm/tech discussion + lack of engagement when trying to talk abt resistance to overton culture here makes it feel hard to find solidarity or (and i am biased here), other reasonable ppl
4 replies
8 recasts
25 reactions
kenny 🎩
@kenny
the problem is that conversations like this on here get no engagement because they nuked visibility of replies on twitter you guys have those convos and your followers see them because they have a feed that surfaces the replies (following feed w/ reply bumping) farcaster by design doesn't support deep conversations because your followers have no feed that shows them your comments deeper than a direct response to a top level cast if you do get into a deep back and forth, it's you and that single person talking in private which is a weird vibe (and keeps others from joining in and bolstering the convo's visibility)
1 reply
1 recast
8 reactions
0xmons ✝️
@xmon.eth
Do we suspect that the algo may change at some pt to encourage this more? Ty for the insight!
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
