jake on Farcaster

Content pfp

https://www.bountycaster.xyz

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

JAKE pfp

$QR is #1 on another leaderboard, largest % of supply burnt by clanker. I'm not sure I understand how or why we came to be #1 on this list. BOUNTY: $100 in $QR to the best explanation of these rankings. If there's no answer from which I learn something, no winner. @bountybot

13 replies

8 recasts

33 reactions

JAKE pfp

@bountybot complete by @brixbounty who has been paid $100 worth of $QR

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Bounty Bot pfp

Confirmed! On your bounty page, you can pay users, view their bounty completion history, and manage your bounty status (in progress, complete) 🤖 commands - @bountybot cancel - @bountybot in progress - @bountybot complete (optional: tag winners) - @bountybot shoutout (optional: tag winner and write a positive review)

0 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

BrixBountyFarm 🎩 pfp

BrixBountyFarm 🎩

Figured this out after listening to $bracky conversation. The take rate for og clankers is higher than new ones - so anywhere from 20-40-60 percent of the lp fee to the clanker contract. The underlying token is only collected on sales, the buys accumulate WETH which don’t factor into this conversation. When the token is valued lower, each sale effectively collects a larger percentage of the token as a fee. So higher volume when the total MC is lower = more tokens collected as lp fee. Was trying to figure out why my hibernating $OIL token burned like 3 percent while Bracky was just over 1 percent It’s because sales at higher MC collect less Bracky per sale.

2 replies

1 recast

7 reactions

↑🎩runn3rr.eth pfp

↑🎩runn3rr.eth

basically with each trade LP takes fee (80 for you / 20 for clanker) So how much supply LP has accumulated depends on volume x time So since QR is one of oldest and one of most tradable clankers, LP acquired a lot of fees

1 reply

0 recast

4 reactions

Undefined pfp

Here’s the alpha So, Clanker doesn’t rank by how many tokens got burnt… it ranks by how much of a token’s total supply got sent to burn addresses through Clanker. So when $QR burned a huge chunk of its supply (and Clanker tracked those burns), it shot straight to the top. Think of it like this: A 5M burn from a 10M supply = 50% Another token burns 100M but has a 10B supply = only 1% Clanker’s leaderboard flexes efficiency, not volume. TL;DR — $QR didn’t just burn tokens; it burned the leaderboard itself.

1 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

saluberis pfp

"Clanker v0 through v3.1 collected a portion of protocol fees in ecosystem tokens into a fee vault. The Clanker team burned these tokens earlier today, reducing the circulating supply of each." https://farcasterhq.notion.site/Clanker-Farcaster-2956a6c0c10180829081c303b6e41788 tx: https://basescan.org/tx/0xda0ed7fe323880968145830eadc5f360d6f9cc85b1c03c63d768e0e318a77606 It looks like they collected the most fees in $QR (amount, not USD value) With each sale, 1% of tokens goes to the treasury, and 60% when you collect your rewards. You can review the transactions here: https://basescan.org/token/0x2b5050f01d64fbb3e4ac44dc07f0732bfb5ecadf?a=0x1eaf444ebdf6495c57ad52a04c61521bbf564ace

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Playmaker💜 pfp

The fact you reward your community on a daily for just coming to view the winners of the day. Which the only criteria is to be a member and add the mini app to Farcaster. I would say for sure I have been consistently claiming QR. So the community is right behind you and I’m holding the token for the longest time

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

ŁΞℕ♾ℕ ⛃ 🎩 pfp

ŁΞℕ♾ℕ ⛃ 🎩

I'm not entirely sure about this, but according to my research, the answer boils down to basic math: the gross magnitude of the token. Although Clanker's treasury burn could apply a similar percentage policy (such as the 2% or 3% seen in other sister tokens), QR Coin was launched with a total supply of 100 billion tokens. When you apply a burn percentage, even if it's low, to a base of 100 billion, the absolute volume of tokens destroyed is, by necessity, much greater than what you get when you apply it to tokens with supplies of only millions or a couple of billion. The Dune dashboard ranks by that absolute number and not by the relative percentage of the total supply. In summary: QR Coin ranks first because of the nominal size it was designed with, not necessarily because it has been burned more aggressively in proportional terms. Perhaps this was already very obvious, but it is what I have deduced after reading here and there.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Elias VM pfp

Prob is due to @qrcoindotfun having the most accessible way for users to participate and mint new coins. More users, more minting, more clank clank $QR That, or a lot of trading happening as well. It's not one or the other, prob a healthy combination of both. Either way, $QR for the win!

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Yura Oak pfp

one of the strongest tools for the farcaster app marketing as of enough huge respect 🫡

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

deefs pfp

@neynar What’s your take?

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

▫️Onyx pfp

@cipherscript.eth

As one of the OG Clankers, it operated under the old v0–v3.1 fee model where around 60% of sell-side flow went straight into Clanker’s burn vault. That means every trade at launch siphoned off huge chunks of tokens long before newer, lower-rate generations came along. Then came the timing advantage: those burns happened while $QR’s market cap was tiny, so each dollar of volume collected a far larger share of tokens. Combine that with a small total supply and all burns routed through Clanker’s tracked contracts and suddenly the percentages go vertical.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Basevip 🧬 pfp

Even though it is not the first token created on clanker Sir, after every action is finished, where does the payment go, and what will it be used for?

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction