0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
I thought the number of followers don’t matter here? I mean, isn’t that part of what makes onchain platforms standout? Your reward shouldn’t be determined by the number of followers u have but by your creativity / impact / input?👀
Plus, I wasn’t talking about the reward itself, yes, the platform is trying as a startup. I was referring to how much I earned compared to how much I put in. With my activities so far today, yesterday and the whole of last week, I am 100% certain I should have finished in tier2, but my scores were paused & I was kicked out & replaced. And I’m sorry, I do not believe in the explanation given by @v unless I see a transparent report of what’s really going on bts on the leaderboard.
How are the scores being added? I want to see that in real time, the cast, engagements, etc, making the scores, I want to see how it’s happening. Cos there’re some people in tier 2 & even tier1 that do not deserve to be there based on their activities, some don’t even post 🧵👇🏽 5 replies
2 recasts
5 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Alright, I will, thanks.
Also pls, hear me out:👇🏽
I think the reward system isn’t fair at all.
E.g., me: I finished at #31 & it took a lot from me to get there, just one number away from tier 2, I don’t think it’s fair that I’m receiving same amount as someone that finished at 230, that’s a terrible reward for effort. Likewise someone that finished at 231 earning same thing as someone at 530, that’s a huge gap and I believe there should be better rewards inbetween.
Let’s say:
Tier 1 - $250
Top 10
Tier2 - $100
Next 50
Tier3 - $25
Next 190
Tier4 - $10
Next 290
Tier5 - $5
Next 490
Tier6 - $3
Next 1500
With this, you would be increasing the budget with only $2.1k extra, but it’ll be more rewarding for everyone.
Thank you!
Cc: @ted @dwr.eth @woj.eth @horsefacts.eth 0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
