Apps generated from a single AI prompt and crypto tokens launched with one click inherently lack long-term value.


When the cost of creation approaches zero, lasting value can only come from sustained building, not instant generation.

Building /recaster, a third-party Farcaster client

Applied AI, databases, data, vibe coding (sic.), open source, community/devrel, remote. 

itinerant businessperson. globalist.

Kuala Lumpur, Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

yeah, coding is the most easiest part..a lot of other details need to be done

this is so true. i think people forget that there's a lot that goes on into feature development, maintenance, etc. 

the idea that you can one shot anything is a lovely idea - try maintaining it with an actual userbase greater than yourself!

101 $tipn

say it louder for the people in the back… and the front.

Solving public goods value capture. | /impact | book.abundance.id

I guess I'm "lucky" then since I'm still building.. ;)

good question!

I think ai is good for mvp or attracting attention, but to have more value, people should keep iteration.

The sad thing, in crypto space, attention is money, after you getting money, you don't want to build good products.

question is if 1 well-thought out app is likely to stick out in the sea of app slop

which approach is better optimized for success in the current market? 

(not saying that should be the prime motivator, but good to know what the market values)

Anyone with a solid portfolio in building apps and launching tokens is likely to focus on long-term value