0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Here's my idea, please don't steal it. I'll be sad sad.
NFT Wormhole: A Surprise-Based NFT Redistribution Game
Vision Summary
NFT Wormhole is a surprise-and-delight redistribution platform for NFTs—part game, part vault, part mysterious delivery mechanism. Users “wormhole” (upload) NFTs into a shared, time-locked orderbook. In return, every time they make a purchase from the shared NFT market, they get airdropped a random NFT from the wormhole pool. It might be a common NFT… or a highly valuable grail. The result is a light, no-token, no-crosschain experience powered entirely by ETH and curiosity.
Core Mechanics
Wormholing NFTs:
Users deposit NFTs into the Wormhole. Each NFT must meet a floor-value threshold (e.g., 0.01 ETH). Deposited NFTs have a 1-year lifecycle—if they aren’t distributed within a year through the airdrop mechanism, they’re permanently removed (burned or archived). 4 replies
0 recast
5 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Interesting, what kinds of deliverables are available to distribute? What happens if the total amount of funding is never reached? Let's say it is reached, the person gets the deliverable, but then the founder rugs later, does the platform do anything for the people who got rugged? Does the final funding get escrowed or sent directly to the founder?
TL;DR - Yeah, I could really use some funding for certain things and have no understanding of how to approach it. I'm just a humble dev, this would bridge that gap for me. Although, my problem is also I'm not popular enough, so these would probably fail like most of my projects have in the past. Hence my questions. Also, rugging can also be perception, so I'm wondering how users might react if the project fails after the funding round is complete. 1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
NFTs or fungible tokens are deliverables that could be claimed in the app. But it could be anything, like "ship a workable mini-app, and I get a certain amount of points in the mini-app to start." And then, if it's delivered, the backer can approve the rest of the funds to be sent.
The $arrow is delivered over a year, so there could be something where, if the founder rugs later, the backers can vote to stop the distribution and shift the remaining $arrow to be distributed to all the backers.
I think the best way this could be used to essentially fund the project in segments. So every project could use this same platform 20+ times, to fund each part that they build out. Eventually, the platform could have this sort of multi-stage thing built in, where there is backing raised to fund multiple stages, delivered in tranches over several years.
yeah, a big part of the motivation for me is so that people with less repuation can try to get some funding for good ideas. 1 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
