Farcaster

fc-updates

April protocol stats

- 85K DAU single day ATH
- First month averaging 70K+ DAU
- First month with 200K+ MAU; 30% month over month from March

Impressive numbers achieved by Farcaster thanks to ALL the users who are dedicating their time on the network for so long. That is why I don't understand many of them are treated as second-class users in Warpcast vs the qDAUs (which I understand are the ones with power badges). And I say that having power badge and OG

Web3 product manager @ Telefónica 🚀  CEO @kairos-tek 👨🏻‍💻 Cofounder @nevtrace  👨‍🏫 Professor & speaker 🌐 https://linktr.ee/joobid

Be specific with what you want changed?

Just giving power badges to people you think are good is not a scalable system. Because everyone will claim that. :)

It's a really complex challenge. What would define those relevant users for me would be a list of those social relationship points where groups converge. This would allow covering all those relevant individuals in each of the spaces, whether they are large or small

Founder of CryptoPlaza. Delegate at dYdX, MakerDAO (Sky), and AAVE. Member of MetaCartel. Ambassador for Superfluid.

The models that have worked best are those that learn from our browsing. I think that prioritization makes complete sense, I wouldn't change it. However, I believe experimenting in these areas would be exciting. There are days when, for example, I would like to select content from new users whom I don't know.

Priority mode is:
1. Your graph
2. Global graph (power badge)
3. Context specific graph (cast author engagement or channel host engagement)

Which one do you think it flawed and how would you concretely change it?

Despite they interact mainly with "power badge" users. Just because they are relevant for many clusters