eliasvm.eth on Farcaster

Daniel Fernandes pfp

Daniel Fernandes

Thanks to Claude again for organizing my braindump into an article. If you hate the new wallet emphasis, this blog's for you. If you love the new wallet emphasis, you can show me who's boss by buying $dfern. Either way: clank clank. Farcaster's Growing Pains: The Delicate Balance Between Crypto Innovation and Mass Appeal

3 replies

3 recasts

23 reactions

Dan Romero pfp

> Lead with social connection, not financial speculation in its public messaging We tried this for 4.5 years. We saturated the market for people interested in this and aren’t specifically focused on political affiliation. My push to you: the network is permissionless. If the opportunity for all social no crypto is so obvious, why isn’t someone building that client? Additionally, I think it’s easy to say you should go after X or Y group of people. Much harder to actually spend the time trying to convince them only to have them tell you why they aren’t interested (or onboard and then just churn).

2 replies

4 recasts

31 reactions

Daniel Fernandes pfp

Daniel Fernandes

I blame Claude for that bulletpoint, jk jk. In all seriousness, I agree, y'all did actually do the thing, and I probably should have mentioned that, because I remember it well: cozy corners, find your tribe, URL to IRL etc. (I feel the messaging kinda worked b/c I have a hunch Rose at Bluesky started borrowing "cozy corners" from @ted, but I can't prove it.)

1 reply

0 recast

9 reactions

ted (not lasso) pfp

ted (not lasso)

fwiw, couldn't agree more with dan. sad, but true. 1. i spent most of last year experimenting with URL to IRL and social connection; it doesn't scale OR you need an entire product team focused on it (think 222, rodeo, timeleft, partiful or luma, etc.) and even then it is still a HUGE risk with slow growth. 2. farcaster is mostly crypto users and has crypto primitives (wallet, coins), but the average person doesn't want to hang out on a crypto social network so >half the existing content and exciting features don't make sense to them. this impacts user acquisition and drives churn. 3. rewarding content with $$ is simply not sufficient to attract new users and have them retain at scale; this was immediately obvious after onboarding the journalists or college students and experimenting with the creator rewards. increasing rewards, improving video UX, etc. was never going to change that. 4. my creator/user onboarding was hand-to-hand combat and the common denominator across the most successful onboarded users was the effort or attention dan, linda or i gave to the relationship; again, not scaleable. leaning into the wallet and tokens is the single greatest decision farcaster has made (outside of its permissionless primitives) to support growth and i fully endorse it, even if it isn't the vision i initially signed up for. in fact, i wish the decision to let go of creators / content / connection and instead lean into crypto happened sooner.

18 replies

7 recasts

106 reactions

Elias VM pfp

This is interesting as we clearly have TBA aiming at content/creators and FC as a client leaning towards usability. The way you express these ideas makes it seem to be mutually exclusive, therefore TBA and FC-client appear being opposed somehow.

1 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

ted (not lasso) pfp

ted (not lasso)

Farcaster the app doesn’t have the brand name recognition or trust with creators (or advertisers) that Base/Coinbase has, nor the distribution of Coinbase, Brian Armstrong, etc. nor a dedicated team (Ops, Product, Marketing) that Base has so Base is actually much better positioned to take a bet on creators than Farcaster is / was

2 replies

2 recasts

29 reactions