Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
Farcaster should have (near-)unlimited length messages like twitter. Having used it for a while, I feel like twitter's long message feature improves its user experience and its usefulness for high quality discussion.
181 replies
427 recasts
2068 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr
We've asked readers if they like long tweets from a UX standpoint and most people prefer to read a longer post in a browser / link vs. in feed.
35 replies
5 recasts
82 reactions
sartocrates
@sartocrates
why not just have it collapsable so like u have to expand it to read longer casts, but like just leave it up to the user to decide how they wanna do it (link it frame it cast it whatever u wanna do) ? i dont get why that has to be something the developers decide so exactly
2 replies
0 recast
26 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr
Someone is free to build another client.
7 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
Garrett
@garrett
What about as a channel feature to allow longer form posts?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
sartocrates
@sartocrates
its just a question ser
1 reply
0 recast
6 reactions
Jimmu
@jimmu.eth
Is the cast length not a Farcaster limitation then? I thought it was a protocol limitation rather than a client one?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Brennan 💎 🧢
@brennan
Screenshot essays are a revealed preference!
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
W3nzel.eth
@wenzel
Why not have an open mind towards what people seem to suggest/like. I know you said you asked people, but literally nobody has a disadvantage, when there's a read more button. 🤔
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jord
@jord
Isn't char limit enforced that the protocol level? I remember asking about this in the dev telegram ages ago.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
John
@silentjohn
Is the character limit at the client level or protocol level?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
