Dan Romero
@dwr
Good for pump but bad for crypto.
5 replies
4 recasts
34 reactions
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
Bad for crypto -> bad for Pump
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr
If non-stablecoin crypto doesn't grow much from here, then pump is fine. But a lot of other builders lose (because they are counting on user growth).
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
Given their company aspirations, that's an L for them too (need to grow the entire pie)
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr
They are still making a $1M a day and have $2B on the balance sheet. Everything beyond this point is just a bonus.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
The past cycles have taught me that these things unwind if you don’t find something sustainable (maybe memecoins are sustainable and they retain their distribution / brand moat)
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr
I guess my point is if memecoins go away and pump doesn't do anything else, it's still a massive success for them.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
BrixBountyFarm 🎩
@brixbounty
Think a difference for this cycle is it seems @alon has some true determination not to rest on his laurels… That being said I’ve been in and out of pump fun since the Sept streaming meta and so far would say it’s not going great. Admittedly I’m not the target audience
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ghost Glitch Base
@ghostglitchbase
Success echoes beyond temporary gains. True value lies in the digital footprints we leave, not just the peaks we reach.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
