Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr
“Why isn’t it just 1% of all volume?” To get more specific: v0 through v3.1 Clankers: fees in WETH and native tokens. We haven’t sold any of the native tokens yet but likely will. v4: fees in WETH. This has been swapped into Clanker. LP position: fees in WETH and Clanker. We keep the Clanker and then swap the WETH for more Clanker. Additionally, fees are not generated in pools on Aerodrome or centralized exchanges like Coinbase.
14 replies
8 recasts
119 reactions

Matt pfp
Matt
@mattlee
What if there was a 2 - 5 year sell delay for pre-v4 native token fees to mitigate sell pressure? The assumption being that any tokens still alive will by then be able to handle it. Otherwise this could hurt small projects.
2 replies
1 recast
2 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr
It’s taxable income for us now. If token goes down massively, we have to pay the taxes regardless. We’re still evaluating a few options.
3 replies
0 recast
9 reactions

Jacob pfp
Jacob
@jrf
it's worth exploring how you can offset the taxable income by distributing project tokens as a marketing expense for farcaster apptokens https://farcaster.xyz/jrf/0x21d71de8
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr
1099 issues :-/
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Jacob pfp
Jacob
@jrf
right, that is the problem it's cool how deel does this through an *employer of record* but i don't think an off-the-shelf (and simple) solution for this exists in crypto it's cool to see you're exploring and open to different approaches, maybe a good solution will emerge over time i'll keep thinking about it, too https://www.deel.com/glossary/employer-of-record/
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction