Pichi
@pichi
What’s “spammy” on Farcaster is very subjective and doesn’t fit the traditional definition of “spam”. The nuance is really difficult to understand and I appreciate when the team clarifies their thinking. Maybe spamminess is as simple as interrupting other’s experience on the app. I need to chew on this for a while. https://farcaster.xyz/dwr.eth/0x83a52a8e
8 replies
8 recasts
26 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
I don’t think either of those are controversial. A reply is a conversation. Topic of conversation is the original post. Just do a top-level cast and tag the person if you have a different topic.
4 replies
0 recast
13 reactions
Pichi
@pichi
I agree with the sentiment, but the nuance is harder to convey. I can’t imagine all the notifications you get every hour and it must be frustrating when people add off topic stuff. I’m guilty of this because I assume when something is recently casted the OG caster is paying attention and online. I’ll add this to my article.
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
Toluwanimi Ajisafe
@retalien
Facts Thanks to @pichi articles and write ups, I think the simplest way to explain spam is to equate it to an anomaly in a conversation Just think of what people do as anomalies in conversations, keep trying to reach out to you when you obviously aren’t answering, deviating from the topic unnecessarily, giving silly answers to genuine conversations, always making statements that they can’t clarify, etc
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Alex aka s1mpl3r.base.eth
@s1mpl3r
In my opinion, a lot of mini-apps offer to share results/information/promotion, and it looks like spam. I try to skip such posts, and I don't know why, but it reminds me of spam frames. If necessary, I can share some examples.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
base
@basewtf
we gotta let go of worrying about being spam. Live your life, who cares what the algo says
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction