Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
There will likely be a bunch of complaints this week about "too much financialization of Farcaster" wrt channel passes. 1. It's still an experiment (why they aren't decentralized) 2. You're free to create a channel without a pass, i.e. free 3. We will have a way to gift passes to people for free
15 replies
19 recasts
140 reactions
Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Longer term, assuming the experiment works, we plan to implement onchain as part of the protocol. The goals with channel passes: 1. Make it simple to acquire or gift 2. Make it expensive / annoying for bots and spam, esp. in channels with thousands of followers 3. Decentralizable
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
AEZY 🟧🌎-‘ pfp
AEZY 🟧🌎-‘
@eitzi.eth
If it is for free, it’s mostly spammed
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
limone.eth 🍋 pfp
limone.eth 🍋
@limone.eth
can a pass be an nft?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
El pfp
El
@elxlee
A degree of centralisation is good for now. Will be cool to have a “vouch for” to join feature, so apart from passes, someone validates for new joiner. This may reduce the occurrence of bots and anyone found vouching for bots, can be removed as well.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
homie pfp
homie
@infinitehomie
What’s the original goal of passes? (Don’t know if you can see this as I am not a power user) If the goal is genuine (which I can’t see why it wouldn’t be) then communicate the goal, and all is well. At first, it seems sketchy to me. But I am a user. Not a dev. This is far from my place. Just curious.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jonny Mack pfp
Jonny Mack
@nonlinear.eth
big fan of this, nice work
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
PsychoShui pfp
PsychoShui
@psychoshui
I think it's important to remember that Farcaster is still in the experimental phase, so it's natural that there will be some growing pains. Decentralization may come in time, but for now, let's see how this experiment unfolds. 🔵🔵
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Andi pfp
Andi
@0xandi
Ok unpopular opp, still gonna voice it: your mission is to open web3 up to mainstream, as you stated. Financialising everything is absolutely not mainstream and not everyone is here to make money, albeit the echo chamber boys signal differently.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Steter pfp
Steter
@steter
It's fine to try what works and what not in order to get what works best. We need a place that, once well optimized, will not have the same problems the other platforms have. keep going!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Eduardo Cruz 🎩 🔵🎀 pfp
Eduardo Cruz 🎩 🔵🎀
@eduardocruz
It says it requires warps to create a channel.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
K3🫵👁️ pfp
K3🫵👁️
@keith33333.eth
who cares, everyone on hear most likely wants to actually make money, nevermind the decentralization. this sounds like a great idea anyway. more freedom. fuck them! lmao!!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Kaxx 🐲🎩 pfp
Kaxx 🐲🎩
@kaxx
Great news✌️
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
WHEL 🎩 pfp
WHEL 🎩
@6112011.eth
Bye bye friend tech v2!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Tia pfp
Tia
@legoodsociety
@dwr.eth - do you fancy doing an art exhibition on billboards across the world together with all the great artists on here? Would love to discuss this - do DM me if you like.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Art 🐹 pfp
Art 🐹
@artisbased.eth
this is great. love a network starting on financialization early rather than 10 years down the line
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
General Ism pfp
General Ism
@general-ism
I think your third comment is a very helpful addition as channel owners can just include all previous participants and start "charging" on a go-forward basis. Would this be an individualized process for gifting passes that may be too onerous on channel hosts though?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
W3nzel.eth pfp
W3nzel.eth
@wenzel
I just love to see that you guys are building and experimenting. I know that that's probably not how you can scale to a 1B company, but hopefully you'll have a close to perfect system in place, once you hit that 1B valuation! ;)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction