Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
How to think about censorship on a decentralized social network The protocol should aim to be like Bitcoin and Ethereum. Self-hosted clients are free to have zero censorship. Hosted clients will have some level of censorship—likely too aggressive of a word in most cases, can use algorithm and/or moderation. Probably less than the average web2 purely centralized platform. Max censorship is going to be on someone else's website, e.g. a blog comment where they are free to delete it completely.
4 replies
10 recasts
95 reactions
Tayyab - d/acc
@tayyab
Agreed. That’s one of the core principles of a “protocol” in my opinion.
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
The key is the protocol. How much like Bitcoin or Ethereum is it? There are good reasons snapchain is less resistant than these L1s, but we should not feel comfortable with it, and and stay there. There are a number of already planed improvements in the direction of UX or DX improvement. There should also be a direction that strengthens the censorship resistance of the protocol. There should be a list of acknowledged attack vectors, and we should be trying to cross them out.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Koolkheart
@koolkheart.eth
Honestly the Bitcoin model is perfect. Let the base layer be completely neutral and let people build whatever UX they want on top, filtered or not
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
fashion snoop⊹ ࣪ ˖
@lambchop
can u update block button to be more efficient why can people I block still follow
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction