Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
How to think about censorship on a decentralized social network The protocol should aim to be like Bitcoin and Ethereum. Self-hosted clients are free to have zero censorship. Hosted clients will have some level of censorship—likely too aggressive of a word in most cases, can use algorithm and/or moderation. Probably less than the average web2 purely centralized platform. Max censorship is going to be on someone else's website, e.g. a blog comment where they are free to delete it completely.
4 replies
10 recasts
106 reactions

Peter Arogundade pfp
Peter Arogundade
@noblepeter2000
It Keeps getting to this, that Dex social will somehow rationalize censorships at certain stage of its growth. Forgetting the bane that led to Dex in the first place. But frankly speaking, is Dex real from the true Dev point of view knowing how this things works. If we are, driving towards true Dex, then let's follow through. I always believe if the centralized world didn't follow through there won't be need for decentralization. Hence, the major needles for decentralization mantra to see it thoroughly through so as to birth another better future if the need is seen to be inevitable.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction