Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/fc-devs
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Improving Farcaster developer docs Looking for examples where the docs are: 1) Confusing 2) Incorrect 3) Missing something that would have saved you a bunch of time
24 replies
24 recasts
355 reactions
Stephan
@stephancill
i think a free, no sign up, public RPC in the docs would help people playing around with the protocol. is there a reason why farcaster doesn't advertise one?
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Not high priority right now. I don't think most new developers are looking to build at the protocol level vs. mini apps. Also: does Ethereum offer this? Two options that work well enough: 1. Practical - Neynar has a free tier 2. Maximally decentralized -- Run your own node
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
shazow
@shazow.eth
No comment on priorities but worth considering why *so many* (like hundreds of projects) are building on atproto but "most new developers" are not building on the farcaster protocol. I can buy the argument that it won't matter if Farcaster doesn't grow etc etc but it is a thing I think about a lot. (I agree that miniapps are a very valuable and important differentiator.)
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
Stephan
@stephancill
i've always used free public RPCs that i learned about on the timeline in my apps 🤷♂️ being able to pull data from the network for free with no sign ups using a simple command line curl is powerful demonstration of the network's capabilities imo farcaster is more similar to base/OP than ethereum. and in evm development new devs don't even think about RPCs because viem/wagmi have public ones built in. see optimism's docs here
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions