Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/ted
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ted (not lasso)
@ted
strong opinion, loosely held: AI-generated videos of humans (today) are a huge unlock AND still feel v uncompelling relative to the best creators sure it may work fine for product marketing videos rn and it’ll get magnitudes better but i’m skeptical it will ever match what makes most influencers so influential
31 replies
13 recasts
160 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
> but i’m skeptical it will ever match what makes most influencers so influential I'd take the other side of this bet.
4 replies
1 recast
7 reactions
ted (not lasso)
@ted
we should discuss over lunch some time
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Omar
@dromar.eth
Memes are good example of this side of the bet
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
jd 🌺
@jdl
same same sailor
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
patrion
@patrion
I’m with @ted on this one. I can see it impacting marketing and other “one-use” cases, but I highly doubt it will (for a very long time at least) be as engaging for long-term engagements. It’s the ultimate distillation of “content”, and when the vector itself is part of that “content”, you get the same soulless slop that permeates most streaming services. And I’m deliberate about that comparison because I’m not saying the AIs will have a monopoly on slop-content, it’s just that they’ll be expanding the pipe so fast I suspect most people will simply tune it out. If the purpose is to create background noise, great, mission accomplished. But for works that other people will actually want to meaningfully engage with? That’s still gonna need human craft.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
