Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/theai
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
for anyone who uses AI + Voice: went on a walk the other day and wanted to learn more about [topic] so i tried out ChatGPT voice for the first time said i wanted to dig into [topic] like i was talking to an expert and started asking questions guys wow it was so dumb mirrored all my questions with ELI5 answers (that i already knew!) was i using it the wrong way or were my expectations were too high from using deep research?
26 replies
7 recasts
77 reactions

Kasra Rahjerdi pfp
Kasra Rahjerdi
@jc4p
no you're totally right the realtime voice models are much dumber even when you request o3 or something $$ to go voice mode, however you can have a convo or kick-off a deep research then hold down on the message and have it read out loud
1 reply
0 recast
9 reactions

Dwayne 'The Jock' Ronson pfp
Dwayne 'The Jock' Ronson
@dwayne
4o is pretty fast. Why wouldn't they use it for real-time voice?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Kasra Rahjerdi pfp
Kasra Rahjerdi
@jc4p
4o is actually the default model for the realtime api https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/realtime -- the $200/mo package allows you to do realtime voice with o3 too but it's very clearly an extremely watered down version of it cause it responds realtime instead of thinking for a while like o3 normally does
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Dwayne 'The Jock' Ronson pfp
Dwayne 'The Jock' Ronson
@dwayne
Oh. 4o isn't that dumb tho?? Or have I not been paying attention?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Kasra Rahjerdi pfp
Kasra Rahjerdi
@jc4p
4o: https://chatgpt.com/share/6854ed92-2c08-8006-ad73-6d9fae7d461d o3-pro (5 min of thinking): https://chatgpt.com/share/6854ee00-fedc-8006-89bf-67e82bf959ae
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction