I don't find the crypto AI agent meta that interesting TBH. 
Don't get me wrong, it's cool that we can combine a blockchain wallet with an OpenAI API key, and perhaps even burn the whole setup into a TEE. But I don't find it compelling for the same reasons why I'm not a memecoiner. It's entertainment-via-token-price all over again, but we already have other outlets for that: traditional gambling & sport betting.
I do think some good will come out of all of this, namely AI/LLM-enabled account abstraction wallets that can generate transactions based on natural language input, for example, dictate to the wallet: "buy $20 of ETH everyday at noon"...and the wallet just figures out the best way to accomplish that, while still remaining non-custodial.

Software Engineer @ Cadence Design Systems. B4: Stanford EE / Illinois ECE

friendly neighborhood shitcaster // working on @pinetree

None of these words were in the bible 😑

But traditional gambling and sports betting don’t let you flex on your friends when you make $100k buying $vagAIna early because you saw $penAIs moon the other day

Contributor @ /walletbeat.

Censorship resistance requires privacy.

Yes. Also perhaps one day it would be possible to run the model in zk, which would be funny because then it would make the recipe for digital life hit all the buzzwords simultaneously: blockchains + zk + AI

Agreed! If the weights and propagation of the weights could be brought onchain through some sort of Eigenlayer coprocessor scheme, then you'd have full e2e digital life. Also agree, whatever keeps people interested in this space that isn't entirely zero-sum is a good thing.

I do think it's cool in terms of proving the whole "blockchains are a digital form of life" thing, in the sense that they are autonomous/unstoppable machines (no off switch). A plain blockchain is already autonomous in this sense, but making its inputs/outputs more humanlike makes this evident to a broader population.