Content
@
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
df
@df
most startups start by serving the same 1% of customers with the highest discretionary spending.
10 replies
0 recast
20 reactions
Drew Beechler
@drewbeechler
Do you think that’s a good or bad strategy? Usually means easier revenue?m, but also flies in the face of zig when others zag.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
ernest 🖋️
@ernestkou
always recommend our clients to go for early adopters too. higher conversion rate to brand advocates
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Zeni
@zeni.eth
is the same true for most successful startups?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Sage
@sage
This is why I find Twitter ads hilarious. Advertising to those who don’t pay 8$ a month is like missing the forest for the trees.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Richard ⚡️
@thebrandrich
This seems like an obvious choice for quick revenue, but it also risks saturating a very competitive space. What if we applied this principle differently by innovating in underserved markets? This could open up unique opportunities and drive growth in ways that aren’t immediately apparent. Any thoughts on balancing these strategies?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
samvox
@samvox
They seek satisfaction, survival and strengthening their foundations.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jinan
@jinan
Targeting the 1% with deep pockets and even deeper snacks
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Mohit
@lxix.eth
Most luxury brands too :)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
non 🐹
@non07777.eth
It's a great learning experience. It's important to secure revenue first.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Majid
@0xmajidx0
And some of them are extremely weak in persuading the public opinion of their customers!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
