I'm old enough now to appreciate that Oasis brought nothing at all new to music and just wrote good songs that, both then and now, sound like they were 30 years old.

In the 90s I thought they were so boring and derivative.

Rated 💯 by multiple networks. Fluent in /unglish. Unbothered by /whatday of the week it is.

Allegedly a designer.

Weren’t they accused of / sued for stealing entire songs also ?

I faded them back in the day but kind dig ‘em recently.

3D / AR/ Full Stack Vibe Coder
https://www.mrbriandesign.com

Yeah I mean they are totally insufferable cunts. Somewhere between Morissey and Eric Clapton on the UK-guitar-rock-bigot scale.

But the songs are very much premium mediocre, rather than the forgettable slop I had them categorized as.

Oh wow. Haha. Yeesh. I guess I missed this:
https://www.nme.com/news/music/liam-gallagher-sorry-if-i-offended-anyone-after-racial-slur-tweet-i-love-you-all-and-i-do-not-discriminate-3875613

Maybe they are just full Eric Clapton.

Hahahha. Yeah, it's weird sometimes things you hate grow on you later and vise versa. Some of those bands like the Doors are almost there own category... There was a lot of early - mid nineties music that I fade now i.e., Trans-am, AIR, (the french band), Mogwai , etc. that I though were exceptional at the time.

*Forgot to add Stone Roses to that previous list

I'd probably still defend most late eighties thrash metal though.

I shat on The Doors once and was promptly trounced. So I’m going to be careful what I say.

Nobody in their right mind will defend Coldplay, though, so I am willing to shit all over them.

First of all fvck Clapton all together never could stand that guy. 
Kinda had; The Verve, Radiohead, Coldplay, and Oasis in one category.

But yeah, to paraphrase: 'premium mediocre, not complete slop' seems fair. 👍

Not sure if Pink Floyd fits into that broader category but they are great no matter what.