0xmons ✝️
@xmon.eth
i don't know how to easily verbalize this but there are many types of dicussions i do not believe i can have rn on farcaster, and i keep feeling like the content i see here is not meant for me ex 1: https://x.com/AgentChud/status/1919555187577860369 me and chud discuss merits of sway/fuel (does anyone here care abt utxos or other l2s or dsls?) ex 2: https://x.com/0xmons/status/1919489996580380871 my giving pushback on recent zora focus on not just content coins but imo general slop (see broader discussion here and some pushback on the original claim "you SHOULD support these onchain creators!") whereas the post here on fc had literally zero discussion: https://warpcast.com/dee/0x87e9fb76 lack of broader evm/tech discussion + lack of engagement when trying to talk abt resistance to overton culture here makes it feel hard to find solidarity or (and i am biased here), other reasonable ppl
4 replies
3 recasts
21 reactions
Tony D’Addeo
@deodad
both interesting to me (turned on notifs for your casts) re 1 there is less off but certainly know of active users here who would find it interesting (ie @horsefacts.eth). it's a chicken and egg problem that all small networks face but my guess is a relatively small handful of accounts posting consistently would be enough to grow the niche significantly re 2 should play fine, I saw plenty thoughtful discussion on the zora probably more of a visibility thing than anything. I know there are also ppl who would push back on push back with "support creators" or "just experiment" but that seems fine https://warpcast.com/deodad/0x96df9f74
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0xmons ✝️
@xmon.eth
Ty for sharing your take Re 2, i think general content coin pushback is a real discussion that can be had, and i participated in that This was more about the framing/vibes of the platform overall, rather than the direct tokenization
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction