Dropped from ~6300 to 4100 follower count with the Warpcast changes, but hardly noticed since a lot of my time on FC is spent in group chats that are much more high-signal for me than algo feeds.

I think a lot about how we might take some of that group chat energy public in ways that might help Farcaster thrive, but still don't have a good answer.

Word-Slinger-in-Chief /slowcore-hq | Senior Editor | GenX eldergoth | dark ambient music nerd | contemplative animist /blxstonesnctuary 🏳‍🌈

off & onchain operations
<--->
Sharing ideas over at /workflow <--->
Problem solving is my jam😎
🎩

Indeed. The group size and setting are critical factors. 

But without disrupting the group chats in their existing high-signal formats, I've been thinking it would *also* be nice to cherry-pick some of our best and most important discussions and make those public in ways that invite further input.

Maybe that energy really works best within a certain setting/group size, and thats what makes it special? Some energy is best felt in certain settings, and there's a trade off of potentially diminishing that energy if its attempted at scale.

agree with the sentiment, also don't have a good idea how to do it. But it feels that energy from groupchats could help improve signal and algo standing for everyone involved, if only it would be "on the timeline" without too much external noise (understand bots).

microsub.

✅ 21 tipped ∙ 21 remaining

78 / 99 (79%)
🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧⬜⬜

✅ 74 tipped ∙ 0 remaining

78 / 78 (100%)
✅✅✅✅✅✅✅✅✅✅

Artsy-fartsy dog mom. Owner of /acrafterscove and I collab with /blxstonesnctuary. trishd.bsky.social. On indefinite hiatus from the purple app.

✅ 188 tipped ∙ 406 remaining

188 / 594 (32%)
🟩🟩🟩⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜

She/her 
Talking *@! In /extracurriculars reminiscing in /gen-x and curating in /trish