Cryptomantis
@cryptomantis
The $FAIR token launch on Farcaster sparked debate with a private presale where early investors held ~90% of the allocation. The creator admits it was a mistake not to enforce a 6-month lockup via smart contract initially, citing the need to raise capital. Thereβs a fairer way to fund projects: @farstore, transparent token launches ensure equal access for all, avoiding insider advantages. Learn how AppCoins raised funds equitably: https://paragraph.com/@kompreni/appcoins
3 replies
2 recasts
8 reactions
flick the dev π©π¦
@flick
There are no one-sized-fits-all launch parameters, not everyone wants to launch into a high tax bonding curve. and I am happy to learn more, but I don't see how this prevents insider advantage other than transparency
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Cryptomantis
@cryptomantis
There is no bonding curve; all presale buyers purchase at the floor price. If the coin doesnβt launch, you receive a full refund. In the worst-case scenario after launch, you can sell with a 3% sell tax. Youβre right that thereβs no one-size-fits-all for launch parameters, but this feels fairer than sniped clanker launches. Check with @niftytime.eth for more details
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
flick the dev π©π¦
@flick
ah ok, thanks for the clarification!
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Cryptomantis
@cryptomantis
π
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction