Zora

In celebration of the one-year anniversary of the Zora protocol and the initial release of zorb, we invite you to mint a commemorative NFT for your collection. Minting is open for 20+22 hours on New Years Day and cements your status as an early supporter of Zora.


[zorb.dev](https://zorb.dev/) by [zora.co](https://zora.co).

ZORBS by ZORA

$EAT on @zora 
 
just eat it

https://zora.co/coin/base:0x862b91b63c231169efd6d46948a55d2067492205?referrer=0xcc9945cc2d149a005ce372d2ad721f2f412228d1

ethics vote:

if something is already minted is "posting" on zora as a coin wrong?

if something is already on zora as a coin is minting the 1/1 elsewhere wrong?

to me these are now two different things if a piece does not exist in any one person's wallet..

if hype builds off a zora post does that not make the piece more desirable to collect a la dog wif hat photo?

if hype builds off a 1/1 does that not make a coin more desirable to buy?

would love to get input from @jessepollak @zora @zakkrevitt.eth @saska @cpoetter.eth @zanzibar @funghibull @nelsonrodmar

Chronically degening onchain | Home Staker $GNO

Co-Founder @shillr + @runtime • /shillr | Accidental art collector & onchain permaculturalist | Serving /vaas | 🌱🌐 www.shillr.xyz

head of partnerships at zora + artist exploring expansive identify

A social network for the new creator economy.

snowboardist building YUKIKU jp: nature, not notifications.

knicksisms

https://indiegogo.com/projects/yukiku

Good question. I think, they are different things. It's like two different items of merchandise. 
Maybe the implications are more far reaching but that's my initial thought.