Chainleft
@chainleft
Now that voice and video cloning are getting trivial, I don't see a world where authentication is only solved by anything other than cryptography and zk proofs.
1 reply
3 recasts
19 reactions
depatchedmode
@depatchedmode
Also, intellectual property needs to only be defined by traditional property rights backed by these, imo. Anybody should be free to use any idea. Only instances can be owned.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Chainleft
@chainleft
IMHO intellectual property = other property = should not be owned. But not: intellectual property = should be owned, other property = can be owned. Sleazy techies are suddenly "abolish intellectual property" but if you come for their Tesla stocks, they're suddenly "shut up commie"
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
depatchedmode
@depatchedmode
Iβm open to collective forms of stewardship for lots of stuff, but I still think there is something fundamentally necessary about allowing individual possession and stewardship of things. For example, I want to own my own shoes. I do not want to own my own healthcare industry.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction