Content
@
https://thenetworkstate.com
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
People who are interested in living in a long-term network state node (so, permanent location, not popup), what are some properties that you would like such a node to have?
61 replies
49 recasts
289 reactions
Catch0x22 (2025 variant)
@catch0x22.eth
ability to defend from government intrusion
2 replies
0 recast
13 reactions
max โ
@baseddesigner.eth
that should be definitely solved for such a node to exist
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Catch0x22 (2025 variant)
@catch0x22.eth
it starts at the legal level of being recognised as a separate entity/state would have to be mutually beneficial, i suppose
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
max โ
@baseddesigner.eth
doesn't have to be, if you just want to live happily in a node you don't need any recognition, it's an external factor look at https://www.nuanu.com/ for example
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
@degencummunist.eth
I disagree with the legal recognition of sovereignty argument tbhโฆ #1 why would they? #2 if they did, wouldnโt it only be as a benefit to anarcho-capitalist / technofeudalist corporations who already control mechanisms of the state, to then NOT have to deal with state regulations of their choosing because โoh weโre a sovereign new thing we donโt gotta abide by anti-slavery / labor laws or human rights. They accepted the Terms and Conditionsโฆโ I think you go the Zapata / Rojava route of garnering community support and coordination (opposed to legal recognition route). Then whether or not they do end up recognizing you, youโre ready because you A. Control a significant amount of economic power (mostly through labor) and B. Build and design your communities in a self sufficient OLUS self defensive way. (My thinking is Earthships + good ole tunnel networks). Then you wonโt get Wacoโd / Ruby Ridgeโd!
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
