18 replies
3 recasts
92 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
yes, you are right that I didn't frame it very well, and I probably shouldn't have even casted something so poorly written.
in any event, my read was that the situation unfolded quite quickly at Farcon and the decision was made to remove him from the company, based on 'lack of disclosure' for lack of a better term.
yet thinking through his side, I am sure he wasn't happy about that judgement. I mean, morality aside, that was his baby.
so what good was a 'statement' from a basic game theory perspective?
what exactly did he have to gain at that point?
conversely, if things had played out slightly differently he may have had room to make an 'official statement' while part of the company, in the light of there being a salvageable dimension of something, whether dignity or otherwise. 0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction